All submissions must be
in well written English,
Paper format is as
Authors should follow
the guidelines below to
Originality: The submitted papers must not be under consideration elsewhere.
Duplicate Check & Anti-Plagiarism Policy:
Every paper should be checked via CrossCheck, Turnitin, or other duplicate
checking systems at their own expense. Otherwise, the authors should be
responsible for the result of rejection due to plagiarism. All papers that are
suspected of plagiarism will not be published or indexed and will be announced
publicly on this conference website.
Submission Type & Method: Please send the
full paper to email@example.com. Before you submit your papers, please check all
the information and make sure your papers are the final files.
Peer Review Process：
1. Based on the ICCBDAI 2020, submissions will be
reviewed in 3 processes: the Preliminary Review, Peer Review, and Last review
by Guest Editors.
2. Preliminary Review: all submissions will be reviewed by the technical
program committees of the conference. The relevance between the manuscripts
and the theme of the conference is the focus of this review. If the submission
won't be in accordance with submission requirements, the editors will send it
back to the authors to modified or reject the submission.
3. Peer Review(Single-blind process): All regular papers are reviewed by at
least three reviewers, usually by five (no more than 5 manuscripts per
reviewer), and rated considering their: Relevance (compulsively required),
Originality (compulsively required), Technical Quality, Significance, and
Presentation; The reviewers are also asked to answer a group of questions that
may help the authors to improve the paper, should it be accepted, namely:
Abstract and Introduction are adequate? Needs more experimental results? Needs
comparative evaluation? Improve critical discussion? Figures are
Adequate? Conclusions/Future Work are convincing? References are up-to-date
and appropriate? Does paper formatting need adjustment? Improve English? And
so on. Finally, the reviewers can provide some free text observations which
were given to the authors and also some free text private observations, made
available only to the program chair. Conflicting reviews may require the
assignment of a new reviewer. In the end, the program chairs decide. The
author has a period for rebuttal, which triggers a workflow involving the
chairs and the reviewers if necessary. All rebuttals are answered but
decisions are final. For the manuscripts for big data and AI applications, the
number of reviewers from big data and AI is almost the same as that from the
corresponding application fields.
4. Last review by Guest Editors: Guest editors should be responsible for all
rebuttals and they would review all materials before submitting them to
1. At least one author must submit the full paper and attend and present the
paper at the conference but he/she can’t present more than two presentations
(either oral or poster).
2. Every paper that was submitted for oral presentation, but was unsuccessful
in that regard, will be considered for poster presentation.
Contact: Should you have any questions,
or you need any materials in English, please contact us